1.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE UPLANDS SETTLEMENT PATTERNS PROJECT
1.1 The Settlement Pattern Research Priorities Policy
1.2 PAC's Concerns with the Policy
1.3 PAC's Upland Settlement Patterns Project
2.0
PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN UPLAND SETTINGS:
AN
ANALYSIS OF SITE DATA IN WATERSHED D
(CONEMUGH RIVER-BLACKLICK CREEK)
2.1 Introduction and the Physical Setting
2.2 Research Issues
2.3 The PASS File Database for the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
2.4 Site Significance and Survey PrioritiesAppendix 1. Summary of Information on Selected Sites in Westmoreland, Indiana, and Somerset Counties
Appendix 2. Summary of CRM Projects In and Adjacent to the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
3.0 THE CONODOGUINET WATERSHED
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Research Design
3.3 Environmental Overview
3.4 Review And Assessment of Existing Data
3.5 Suggested Revisions to the Survey Priorities Policy
3.6 Conclusions
4.1 Introduction to the Project
4.2 The Existing Data
4.3 Research Issues
4.4 Site Significance
4.5 Site Location Expectations
4.6 Summary and RecommendationsAppendix 1. Bibliography of CRM Studies for the Brandywine Creek Watershed
SECTION 2.0
Figure 1: Location of the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Figure 2: Major Towns
Figure 3: Townships
Figure 4: Location of the Conemaugh River and Major Tributaries
Figure 5: Elevations in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Figure 6: Distribution of Soil Types
Figure 7: Surface Geology in the Watershed
Figure 8: Location of Oil and Gas Wells and Fields
Figure 9: Location of Coal Fields and Mines
Figure 10: Location of the Catawba Indian Path and Loyalhanna Chert Source
Figure 11: Location of Previously Excavated Archaeological Sites Relative to the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Figure 12: Location of All Archaeological Sites Recorded in the PASS Files in theWatershed
Figure 13: Sites Categorized by Topographic Settings on Soil Type Basemap
Figure 14: Sites Categorized by Topographic Settings on Geology Basemap
Figure 15: Sites Associated with the Monongahela Group Geological Formation
Figure 16: Site Cluster on Laurel Ridge
Figure 17: Archaeological Site Types in the Monongahela Group Formations
Figure 18: Location and Density of Archaic Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 19: Location and Density of Archaic Sites on a Soil Type Basemap
Figure 20: Location and Density of Archaic Sites on a Geology Basemap
Figure 21: Location and Density of Early Archaic Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 22: Location and Density of Middle Archaic Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 23: Location and Density of Late Archaic Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 24: Location and Density of Terminal Archaic Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 25: Woodland Site Types on a Soil Type Base Map
Figure 26: Location and Density of Early Woodland Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 27: Location and Density of Middle Woodland Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 28: Location and Density of Late Woodland Sites on a Surface Geology Basemap
Figure 29: Location of CRM Projects
Figure 30: Butch's Sites
Figure 31: Proximity of Sites to the Catawba Path
Figure 32: Distances between Village Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Photo 1: Mortar Stone
Photo 2: Rock Shelter
SECTION 3.0
Figure 1: Location and Topography of the Conodoguinet Creek Drainage
Figure 2: Conodoguinet Creek and its Tributary Streams
Figure 3: Geology of the Conodoguinet Creek Drainage
Figure 4a: Cumberland County Soils
Figure 4b: Franklin County Soils
SECTION 4.0
Figure 1: Location of the Brandywine Creek Watershed in Southeastern Pennsylvania
Figure 2: Physiography of the Brandywine Creek Watershed
Figure 3: Frequency of State Environmental Review Cultural Resources Reports for the Brandywine Watershed on file at the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
Figure 4: Historically Documented Native American Trails in Southeastern Pennsylvania
SECTION 2.0
Table 1: Soil Types and Associated Archaeological Sites found in the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed
Table 2: Geologic Formations and Associated Archaeological Sites in the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed
Table 3: Point Types and Associated Cultural Periods Region VII
Table 4: Variables used in the Crooked Creek Survey
Table 5: Results of the Crooked Creek Survey
Table 6: Environmental Variables Used in the Skelly and Loy GIS Model
Table 7: Topographic Setings Investigated During the Kittanning Bypass Survey
Table 8: Summary of Period of Occupation and Environmental Setting of Sites Investigated in the Meyersdale Project
Table 9: Distribution of Site Types in Upland and Floodplain Settings on the Meyersdale Project
Table 10: PASS File Sites associated with the Monongahela Group Geologic Formation
Table 11: Number and Percentage of Sites by USGS Quad In the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed
Table 12: Frequency of Chronological Components in the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed
Table 13: Topographic Settings of Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Table 14: Number and Percentage of Sites by USGS Quad In the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed
Table 15: Distribution of Site Types for the Total Watershed, Upland and Floodplain Settings
Table 16: List of Site Types by Topographic Setting and Cultural Period for Single Component Sites
Table 17: Multicomponent Sites in the Blacklick Drainage Area - Non-Upland Settings
Table 18: Multicomponent Sites in the Blacklick Drainage Area - Upland Settings
Table 19: Condition of Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Watershed
Table 20: Causes of Site Destruction Recorded in the PASS Files
Table 21: Summary of Area covered by CRM Projects and Number of Sites Discovered
Table 22: Cultural Resource Projects in the Conemaugh - Blacklick Watershed and Adjacent Areas
Table 23: National Register Eligibility Assessments Recorded in the PASS File Database
Table 24: Density of Archaeological Sites found through Systematic Survey
Table 25: Methods Used to Discover Sites in the Conemaugh-Blacklick Drainage
SECTION 3.0
Table 1: Bedrock Formations of the Conodoguinet Watershed
Table 2: Inter-county Concordance And Description of Soil Associations
Table 3: List of Sites in Watershed 135 Showing Setting Criteria
Table 4: Method of Site Discovery by Setting
Table 5: List of Diagnostic Artifacts Recovered by Site
Table 6: Chronology of Sites in Watershed 135 by Setting
Table 7: Distribution of Sites in Watershed by Landform and Known Component
Table 8: CRM Investigations in the Conodoguinet Watershed
Table 9: Distribution of Site Slopes by Setting
Table 10: Site Aspect by Setting
Table 11: List of Site Types in Watershed by Setting
Table 12: Distance to Primary Water Source by Setting
Table 13: Elevation Above Primary Water Source by Setting
Table 14: Distance to Confluence by Setting
Table 15: Elevation Above Confluence by Setting
Table 16: Sites in Watershed 135 by Setting and Soil Group
Table 17: Sites in Watershed 135 by Setting, Soil Group, and Known Component
SECTION 4.0
Table 1: Topographic Settings of the Brandywine Creek Archeological Sites and their PASS-File Codes
Table 2: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of PASS-File Documented Sites in the Brandywine Creek Watershed Listed by Topographic Settings
Table 3: Data for Sites Receiving Phase II Archeological Evaluation
Table 4: Frequencies of PASS-File Documented Sites located in the Brandywine Creek Watershed Listed by Discovery Methods and Topographic Settings
Table 5: Frequencies of PASS-File Documented Sites located in the Brandywine Creek Watershed Listed by Discovery Methods and Site Types
Table 6: Frequencies of Prehistoric Components Listed by Topographic Settings for PASS-File Documented Sites Located in the Brandywine Creek Watershed
Table 7: Distribution of PASS-File Documented Sites located in the Brandywine Creek Watershed Listed by Topographic Settings and Dated versus Undated Components
Table 8: Frequencies of Prehistoric Sites Listed by Presence of Lithic Raw Materials and Topographic Settings for PASS-File Documented Sites Located in the Brandwine Creek Watershed
Table 9: Frequencies of Prehistoric Sites Listed by Presence of Lithic Raw Materials and Topographic Settings for PASS-File Documented Sites Located in the Brandywine Creek Watershed
Table 10: Distribution of Artifact Classes by Topographic Setting
Table 11: Frequency Distribution of Sites and Artifact Classes by Topographic Setting within the Brandywine Creek Watershed
Table 12: Correlation Table: Environmental Review (ER) Number and Bibliographic Reference
Table 13: Brandywine Watershed: Archaeology Report Summary Form
SECTION 5.0
Table 1: Single Component vs. Multicomponent Sites
Table 2: Number of Datable Components
Patricia Miller, Coordinator
KCI Technologies, Inc, 5001 Louise Drive, Suite 201, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
Dean Snow, Outside Reviewer
Department. of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 409 Carpenter
Building, University Park, PA 16802
Brandywine Watershed
Robert G. Kingsley
John Milner Associates, Inc., 535 N Church Street, West Chester, PA 19380
Peter E. Siegel
John Milner Associates, Inc., 535 N Church Street, West Chester, PA 19380
Douglas C. Kellogg
John Milner Associates, Inc., 535 N Church Street, West Chester, PA 19380
Conodoguinet Watershed
Philip A. Perazio
Kittatinny Archaeological Research Inc., PO Box 117, Stroudsburg, PA 18360
William J. Meyer, Jr.
Kittatinny Archaeological Research Inc., PO Box 117, Stroudsburg, PA 18360
Conemaugh-Blacklick
Beverly Chiarulli
Department of Anthropology, G12E McElhaney Hall, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.,
Indiana, PA 15708
Peer Reviewers
Fred Kinsey
534 Saratoga Road, Lancaster, PA 17603
Michael Stewart
Dept. of Anthropology, Gladfelter Hall, Temple University, Philadelphia,
PA 19122
Paul Raber
Heberling Associaates, Inc, 415 Mifflin Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652
Sarah W. Neusius
Dept. of Anthropology, G12E McElhaney Hall, Indiana U. of Penna., Indiana,
PA 15708
William Johnson
PO Box 9175, Pittsburgh, PA 15224-0175
Kristen Beckman
Skelly & Loy, 520 Seco Road, Monroeville, PA 15146
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
Kurt Carr
Bureau of Historic Preservation, Penna Historical and Museum Comm., Box
1026, Harrisburg, PA 17108-1026